The controversy over Mass Effect 3's ending is long-since dead and gone, but the lessons learned from it - both by fans and by developers - still resonate within the community even now, more than a full year after the fact. For those of you who need a bit of a refresher, things kind of went something like this: Mass Effect 3's ending was rushed and awful. Fans expressed outrage that it was rushed and awful, and demanded that Bioware changed it. After one of the biggest media frenzies seen in the games industry, Bioware eventually acceded to its players.
Oddly enough, this caused even further polarization throughout the community. There were many who claimed that changing the ending was a mistake - that, as a creator and artist, Bioware had a responsibility to ensure the artistic integrity of their title. Changing the ending simply because the fans demanded it was an insult, and represented a failure on the part of Bioware to stand their ground and stick to their guns. Those who opposed the extended cut included in their numbers gamers, journalists, and even developers and designers.
"It's not about what ending we get," tweeted one aspiring game designer to Kotaku, "it's about the total disrespect and destruction of the artistic integrity of gaming's best."
"Imagine we lived in a world where artists regularly changed their art based on audience demands." wrote Gamespot's Laura Parker. "Imagine Monet repainting Water Lilies in black and white because people objected to color. Imagine Salman Rushdie trashing The Satanic Verses because people objected to its implications. The very idea of allowing any work of art to be changed because someone, somewhere didn't like it would render all art meaningless."
The arguments seem very clear-cut, no? If video games - as we've maintained for well over a decade now - are well and truly art, then does not any change made to said games on the behalf of anyone - be it fans, publishers, or critics -somehow make their position less legitimate? Does not Bioware's decision somehow undercut their title's status as a work of art; their status as artists?
The short answer is "no."
The truth is, creative control works a little differently in the medium of gaming. Games aren't static, unchanging modes of entertainment. A game isn't a painting, or a movie, or a novel. A game is an experience; a mercurial, ever-changing represents a conversation between player and developer; a dialogue between creator and consumer. Games are art; yes, but at the same time, they're something more; a player will generally engage with a game like Mass Effect to a much greater degree than they would with another product.
Further, we cannot forget that games are ultimately commodities, even if they can be considered artistic ones. As with any other product, if a customer has a problem with that product - if they have a concern with how something works - they can take their complaints back to the original developer. If enough people complain, the developer might be forced to change that product. It's the same deal with games: changing how a game ends because of a fan outcry doesn't somehow make it less legitimate as a work of art.
Quite the contrary, actually: the simple fact that the fans are willing to cause such a stink means that they were drawn in and engaged. They loved the experience enough that when it ended in a less-than-satisfactory manner, they rose up.
Finally, let's talk about logistics. See, there was a point, years ago, when developers would listen to fan input between iterations of their franchises, and adjust according to what they heard. Now, with new and more modern methods of distribution, developers are equipped with the Developers can adjust their titles in real-time.
In short, due to their unique position, games are a malleable art form. They can be shaped and reshaped, molded by both gamer and developer; and still retain everything that made them art in the first place.
Do developers still have the final say in how their product turns out; full creative control over what they do with their games? Most definitely. At the same time, they ignore input from their players at their own peril. After all, these are the people who are going to be playing the title - one would assume that they know what they want, no? Ultimately, it's up to the development staff to decide where the line is drawn, to determine when they're going to say no to their fans. And that's exactly how it should be.
Anyway, that's enough rambling for today. Next week, we're going to delve into the idea of a final boss - and whether or not it's necessary for a satisfactory video game narrative. Until then, keep exploring.
Five Reasons To Love (And Hate) Free To Play
"Free To Play" is the phrase that's been on everyone's lips lately, particularly in the world of MMOs. It's the new business model that every production executive is cooing over; the model that many have come to hate with a burning, fiery passion. But is it really so bad?
Ten Things Rockstar Did Right With GTA Online
So...by now, most of you are probably aware that Rockstar kind of botched the launch of GTA Online. I mean, they seriously botched it. To the point that it was completely unplayable. At the same time, though...they handled the situation masterfully - there's a lot of stuff they actually did right.
Five Reasons To Look Forward To League's Fourth Season
With this year's LCS drawn to a close, a new season of League of Legends is just about upon us. It's bringing with it some very, very big changes. Trust me when I say they're something to be very, very excited for.
Indie Game Of The Week: Magicka
This week, I'm revisiting an old favorite of mine - and one that I desperately hope you've heard of. Magicka tells the tale of one to four homicidal, sociopathic wizards, their not-vampire instructor, and an eldritch abomination that threatens to destroy the whole world. Did I mention you can blow up pretty near anything you've a mind to?
Indie Game of The Week: Huntsman: The Orphanage
This week, I'll be taking a look at Huntsman: The Orphanage; a rather fresh take on the horror genre that manages to convey fear and anxiety without any violence or gore whatsoever. It's actually pretty impressive.
Ten Ways Social Media Has Changed The MMO
Social networks have effectively changed the way we...well, do pretty much everything. We interact differently, work differently, and even view the world differently since the birth of Facebook - there's even talk that it's bringing about a fundamental change in the way we think. It should thus come as no surprise that they've also had a considerable impact on the world of MMOs.
Indie Game of The Week: Outlast
This week, we'll be taking a look at Outlast, a horror game that tosses you into the shoes of independent journalist Miles Upshur as he explores the sinister Mount Massive Asylum. Spoiler alert: it doesn't go so well for dear Miles.
Indie Game Of The Week: The Bridge
This week, we're going to take a look at puzzle platformer "The Bridge," a rather esoteric game about a mad scientist, impossible geometry, and a reckless disregard for the laws of time, space, physics, and gravity. Shall we get started?
League: Ten Tips To Help You Be A Better Support
Historically, support has kind of been the butt-monkey role of League of Legends. In spite of being one of the most valuable and vital roles in the game, few people ever seem to want to play it. As a result...there aren't all that many people who can actually play it well. We need to change that.
Indie Game Of The Week: Amnesia: A Machine For Pigs
For those of you who've been living under a rock, I've some news: Amnesia: A Machine For Pigs has finally released. It's about as terrifying as everyone expected it to be, but for entirely different reasons.